US Vote Smart

Candidate Path

Candidate Path

Submitted by john wertz on 2018-02-18 05:04:00

PROS

  • Understands all aspects of civil law.  Understands how this court works, and the challenges facing the court. 
  • Will hit the ground running, with no on the job training.
  • Supports conservative principles; strict constructionist
  • Has extensive legal experience and promotes the Constitution; has vast understanding of practices of all courts
  • Does not support judicial activism but won't hestitate to challenge unconstitutional law(Obamacare, Gay Marriage Act);
  • Solid background in Probate Law(24 years).  Equal time at Trial and Appeals Courts
  • Had to correct her opponent in debates
  1. The first correction was in EF Debate (1/4/18), when Ms. Linzer said the court's minimum case value/amount by statute was $200K.  Ms Bayes corrected her by saying the actual amount is only $500.
  2. At a Libery Belles forum on 1/11/18, in Panorama Village, Ms. Linzer said the County Auditors position was created by the Texas Constitution.  Once again, Ms. Bays had to correct her, saying the Auditors office is created under Local Government Code.

CONS

  • Certified specialist in probate court.  This is not a probate court; this court never has and never will hear a probate case because it has no jurisdiction to ever hear one. These are civil lawsuits between businesses and individuals, as well as property tax cases. 
  • Concerns that her willingness to challenge unconstitutional "settled law" may result in increased appeals, but is good in citing reasoning
  • This court also has jurisdiction to hear criminal cases anytime the judge wants to (right now the court has voluntarily shifted its criminal case load to the other courts).  That could change with a change of judge.  Ms. Bays  has never tried a criminal case either.
  • Needs thicker skin.  Being a judge is a lonely job, and she's gotta get tougher.